To write an essay (literature review) document from critically comparing two Computer Science Scientific papers -- 2

Hi, we are a small company who perform writing for other businesses. Our staff who does this specific task is on holiday and we are looking for someone who would be able to complete this task asap. We are looking for someone with Exceptional writing and comparing skills. Who has FLUENT ENGLISH ESSAY writing. And has a great depth of knowledge in computer science, automation, robots, human machine etc. And in Reading in computer science. Ideally someone with a Masters or PHD in computer science, and who has English as there mother/first language. The task is to critically compare two computer science scientific papers. The two scientific papers will be provided. Then write write an essay document of the comparison between the two scientific papers, so writing a literature review. Present a coherent framework: ‒ what are the major approaches? ‒ what are the main open problems? Structure: ‒ Introduction ‒ Problem analysis and proposed solution ‒ Implementation and evaluation ‒ Discussion and related work ‒ Conclusions and future work ‒ Abstract Make sure it flows well: Flow and Signposts (Cross-referencing) • A well-written document flows naturally ‒ It has connections between sections, subsections, and paragraphs • Add signposts (cross-references) to help the reader ‒ Where did we come from, where are we now, where are we going? ‒ Example: “In the last section we saw a formal definition of X. In this section we will see some examples of X, in preparation for section 3 which will introduce a special case of X which we will focus on in the rest of the report.” Take into consideration simplicity and clarity. Use your own words and sentences throughout. Some of the things to make sure on would be: - clarity of the work. - technical depth of the chosen material (in this case human machine / automation). - your greater understanding of the material presented. - your greater understanding of the wider area. - the extent to which you are able to make connections to related research or other things you learned about. - the originality and depth of your own considerations concerning the presented topics. - the quality of the work. MOST IMPORTANT!: ‒ Critical analysis – Evaluation of quality, significance, relevance ‒ Synthesis – Combining existing things into something new The reader should be convinced that you understand the: ‒ the existing work ‒ what is good and bad about it ‒ what is significant about it ‒ what is relevant to your work ‒ how it relates to other areas The overall task is to critically compare the two scientific papers and write an essay on it. We also have similar previous work (but for different topics) which we've done, (to help you if you need an idea of what needs to be done). Thank you for anymore information or details feel free to contact me. Thanks